Envia per correu aquest article 
Amaga
Mostra-ho tot
Anàlisi crítica del discurs polític en anglès i castellà a través dels mitjans de comunicació: un estudi contrastiu de la manipulació i la persuasió en moments de crisi
Resum
Aquest estudi ofereix una anàlisi detallada del llenguatge emprat en la cobertura de la pandèmia per The Guardian i El País, examinant la representació de les postures governamentals i la seva influència en la resposta dels ciutadans. S’investiga el paper d’aquests mitjans com a canals de comunicació governamental i el seu efecte en la percepció pública durant la crisi sanitària. A través d’una anàlisi rigorosa, confirmem la nostra hipòtesi que els governs del Regne Unit i Espanya van exercir una influència ambivalent sobre la població mitjançant l’ús estratègic d’un discurs manipulador. Aquest estudi es basa en la creació d’un corpus bilingüe i en l’ús d’anàlisi textual avançada per desentranyar les tàctiques de control i persuasió aplicades. Les troballes revelen una tendència cap a l’ús d’un lèxic carregat negativament i d’estratègies emocionals, així com l’ús de metàfores i argot tècnic per establir una asimetria informativa entre les autoritats i la ciutadania.
Paraules clau
Cites
Abbas, Ali Haif. (2020). Politicizing the Pandemic: A Schemata Analysis of COVID-19 News in Two Selected Newspapers. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09745-2
Berber Sardinha, Tony. (2000). Comparing corpora with WordSmith Tools: How large must the reference corpus be? En Adam Kilgarriff y Tony Berber Sardinha (eds.), Proceedings of The Workshop on Comparing Corpora (pp. 7-13). Association for Computational Linguistics. Publicación en línea. https://aclanthology.org/W00-0900.pdf
Berger, Peter, y Luckmann, Thomas. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin.
Bhatia, Vijay, y Bhatia, Aditi. (2017). Interdiscursive Manipulation in Media Reporting: The Case of the Panama Papers in India. En María Angeles Orts, Maurizio Gotti y Ruth Breeze (eds.), Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres (pp. 29-50). Peter Lang.
Bleiker, Roland, y Hutchison, Emma. (2008). Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics. Review of International Studies, 34, 115-135.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14-25.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul, y Schäffner, Christina. (1997). Discourse and politics. En Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 206-230). SAGE Publications.
Cialdini, Robert B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 2001(9), 72-81.
Coleman, Stephen, Konstantinova, Nely, y Moss, Giles. (2020). The Pandemic and its Publics: How people receive, interpret and act upon official guidance. University of Leeds.
Covello, Vincent T. (2003). Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis Communication. Journal of Health Communication, 8(supl. 1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851971
Damasio, Antonio R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. G. P. Putnam.
Davison, W. P. (2020). Public Opinion. Encyclopedia Britannica. Publicación en línea.
Engberg, Jan. (2020). Institutional Dissemination of Legal Knowledge: An Instance of Knowledge Communication. En Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maci y Michele Sala (eds.), Scholarly Pathways: Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Exchange in Academia (pp. 175-205). Peter Lang.
Fairclough, Norman. (2014). Language and Power. Longman.
Fairclough, Norman, y Fairclough, Isabella. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman, y Wodak, Ruth. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. En Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 258-284). SAGE Publications.
Fossum, John Erik, y Schlesinger, Philip. (2007). The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? Routledge.
Garofalo, Giovanni. (2017). La insoportable levedad del acusar: el lenguaje de la valoración en las querellas de la Fiscalía Superior de Cataluña contra Carme Forcadell i Lluís. Franco Angeli.
Gramsci, Antonio. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart.
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.
Heath, Robert L., y Bryant, Jennings. (2000). Human Communication Theory and Research: Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heffner, Joseph, Vives, Marc-Lluís, y FeldmanHall, Oriel. (2021). Emotional responses to prosocial messages increase willingness to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110420
Kakisina, Peggy A., Indhiarti, Tantri R., y Al Fajri, Muchamad Sholakhuddin. (2022). Discursive Strategies of Manipulation in COVID-19 Political Discourse: The Case of Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079884
Kaplan, Nora. (2004). Nuevos desarrollos en el estudio de la evaluación en el lenguaje: La Teoría de la Valoración. Boletín de Lingüística, 16(22), 52-78.
Kilgarriff, Adam, y Renau, Irene. (2013). esTenTen, a Vast Web Corpus of Peninsular and American Spanish. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.617
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel, y Tugwell, David. (2004). The Sketch Engine. En Geoffrey Williams y Sandra Vessier (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh EURALEX International Congress (pp. 105-116). Université de Bretagne-Sud.
Martin, James R., y White, Peter R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, Jim R., y Rose, David. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. Continuum.
McEnery, Tony. (2016). Keywords. En Paul Baker y Jesse Egbert (eds.), Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research (pp. 20-32). Routledge.
Methven, Elyse. (2022). “There is no need for anyone to be concerned”: The discursive legitimation of coercive police powers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista de Llengua i Dret, Journal of Language and Law, 77, 54-70. https://doi.org/10.2436/rld.i77.2022.3773
Orts, María Á, y Vargas-Sierra, Chelo. (2022). Warning, or Manipulating in Pandemic Times? A Critical and Contrastive Analysis of Official Discourse Through the English and Spanish News. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(3), 903-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09869-z
Partington, Alan, y Taylor, Charlotte. (2018). The Language of Persuasion in Politics: An Introduction. Routledge.
Riorda, Mario, y Bentolila, Silvia. (2020). Cualquiera tiene un plan hasta que te pegan en la cara. Aprender de las crisis. Paidós.
Scott, Mike. (2016). In search of a bad reference corpus. En Dawn Archer (ed.), What’s in a Word-list? (pp. 79-91). Routledge.
Swales, John M. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika. (2015). Language and Emotion. The Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. En Ulrike M. Lüdtke (ed.), Emotion in Language (pp. 157-154). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.10.08sch
Seeger, Matthew W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: an expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600769944
TenHouten, Warren. (2014). Emotion and Reason: Mind, Brain, and the Social Domains of Work and Love. Routledge.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Vargas-Sierra, Chelo, y Orts, María Á. (2023). Sentiment and emotion in financial journalism: A corpus-based, cross-linguistic analysis of the effects of COVID. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10, 219. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01725-8
Wagner, Anne, Matulewska, Aleksandra, y Marusek, Sarah. (2022). Pandemica Panoptica: Biopolitical Management of Viral Spread in the Age of Covid-19. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35, 1081-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09821-1
White, Peter R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259-284.
Yuan, Hang, Long, Qinyi, Huang, Guanglv, Huang, Liqin, y Siyang, Luo. (2022). Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control. Social Science & Medicine, 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114677
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58992/rld.i80.2023.3995
