Envia per correu aquest article 
Amaga
Mostra-ho tot
Negociació d’un nou marc normatiu per a les plataformes audiovisuals d’ús compartit: propostes per a un model de governança responsable de la llibertat d’expressió en línia
Resum
Hi ha un impuls polític inèdit i progressiu en la política europea de mitjans audiovisuals. Es tracta de la implementació de noves regles sobre els proveïdors de plataformes audiovisuals de compartició de vídeos (VSP) pel que fa a la protecció dels menors contra contingut nociu i de tota la ciutadania contra la incitació a la violència i l’odi. Tanmateix, l’aplicació del principi del país d’origen, el principi bàsic de la Directiva de serveis de comunicació audiovisual i la regulació de mitjans audiovisuals a tota la Unió Europea, interferirà intrínsecament amb l’objectiu polític declarat d’equilibrar el terreny de joc davant les plataformes VSP. Aquest article avalua les conseqüències potencials d’aquestes disfuncions normatives en el context de la regulació eficaç dels discursos de l’odi a tot Europa. Argumenta que la coregulació del model de governança responsable podria abordar i mitigar la pèrdua de diversitat normativa i esbossa un pla per aconseguir-ho. Està en joc la (major) fragmentació d’Internet. Per tant, és important i urgent trobar respostes normatives adequades a Europa per garantir mercats audiovisuals pluralistes i diversos.
Paraules clau
Cites
ARTICLE 19. (2018). Responding to “hate speech”: Comparative overview of six EU countries. London: ARTICLE 19.
Barata Mir, Joan . (October 24, 2018). The New Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Turning Video Hosting Platforms into Private Media Regulatory Bodies. [Blog post]. Stanford Center for Internet and Society blog.
Barata Mir, Joan. (February 25, 2020). Regulating content moderation in Europe beyond the AVMSD. [Blog post]. LSE Blog.
Bárd, Petra, & Bayer, Judit. (2016). A comparative analysis of media freedom and pluralism in the EU Member States. Study Commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
Benesch, Susan, Buerger, Cathy, Glavinic, Tonei, Manion, Sean, & Bateyko, Dan. (August 4, 2020). Dangerous Speech: A Practical Guide. Dangerous Speech Project.
Broughton Micova, Sally. (2019). The Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Balancing Liberalisation and Protection (Draft). In Sally Broughton Micova, The Audiovisual Forthcoming Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, edited by Elda Brogi and Pier Luigi Parcu. Rochester, New York: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bunting, Mark. (May 4, 2018). From editorial obligation to procedural accountability: policy approaches to online content in the era of information intermediaries. Journal of Cyber Policy, 3, 2, 165–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2018.1519030.
Council of Europe. (2017). Media Regulatory Authorities and Hate Speech. Belgrade: Council of Europe.
Drunen, Max Z. van. (July 24, 2020). The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility. Journal of Media Law, 0, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067.
European Commission. (November 23, 2016). Media pluralism and democracy – Special Eurobarometer 452. Brussels: European Commission.
———. (2016). Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. Brussels: European Commission.
Financial Conduct Authority. (October 19, 2017). Regulatory sandbox lessons learned report. London: Financial Conduct Authority.
Flew, Terry. (2018). Platforms on Trial. InterMEDIA, 46, 2, 24–29.
Frosio, Giancarlo F. (December 14, 2017). Why keep a dog and bark yourself? From intermediary liability to responsibility. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 26, 1, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eax021.
Helberger, Natali. (2018). Challenging Diversity - Social Media Platforms and a New Conception of Media Diversity. In Digital Dominance -The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (p. 153–75). New York: NY Oxford University.
———. (July 7, 2020). The Political Power of Platforms: How Current Attempts to Regulate Misinformation Amplify Opinion Power. Digital Journalism, 0, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1773888.
Human Rights Watch. (2020). “Video Unavailable” - Social Media Platforms Remove Evidence of War Crimes. Human Rights Watch.
Ibrus, Indrek, & Rohn, Ulrike. (2016). Sharing killed the AVMSD star: the impossibility of european audiovisual media regulation in the era of the sharing economy. Internet Policy Review, 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.2.419.
Kaye, David. (2019). Report on Online Hate Speech. UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. United Nations Humans Rights Office of the High Commissioner.
Kettemann, Matthias C. (2020). The Normative Order of the Internet: A Theory of Rule and Regulation Online. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuklis, Lubos. (November 29, 2018). European regulation of video-sharing platforms: what’s new, and will it work? [Blog post]. Media@LSE blog.
———. (2020). Media Regulation at a Distance: Video-Sharing Platforms in Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Future of Content Regulation. MediaLaws - Law and Policy of the Media in a Comparative Perspective, 2 (2), 95–110.
———. (February 26, 2020). Video-Sharing Platforms In AVMSD – A New Kind Of Content Regulation. In Forthcoming, Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy. New York: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527512.
Mansell, Robin, & W. Edward Steinmueller. (2020). Advanced introduction to platform economics. Elgar Advanced Introductions. Cheltenham, UK Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Michalis, Maria. (2014). Focal Points of European Media Policy from Inception till Present: Plus Ça Change? In Karen Donders, Caroline Pauwels, & Jan Loisen (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy (p. 128–142). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032195_8.
Milosavljević, Marko, & Sally Broughton Micova. (2016). Banning, Blocking and Boosting: Twitter’s Solo-Regulation of Expression. Medijske Studije, 7 (13), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.7.13.3.
Noll, Rob van der, Helberger, Natali, & Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw. (September 14, 2015). Regulating the new information intermediaries as gatekeepers of information diversity. Info, 17 (6), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0034.
Ofcom. (September 18, 2018). Addressing harmful online content A perspective from broadcasting and ondemand standards regulation. London: Ofcom.
Rozgonyi, Krisztina. (2018). A new model for media regulation. Intermedia, 46 (1), 18–23.
Spielkamp, Matthias. (November 17, 2018). Why Zuckerberg’s “Independent Governance and Oversight” board is not gonna fly (but some of his other ideas are at least worth discussing). [Post blog]. AlgorithmWatch.
Wagner, Michael A. (2014). Revisiting the Country-of-Origin Principle in the AVMS Directive. The Journal of Media Law, 6 (2), 286-304. https://doi.org/10.5235/17577632.6.2.286.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2436/rcdp.i61.2020.3537
